AJK Elections: Tanveer Ilyas Defeated, IPP Boycotts Third Phase

0:000:00

At a glance

  • PML-N dismissed rigging allegations in AJK elections, while opposition leaders claimed widespread irregularities.
  • The Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP) had previously rejected the election process and raised concerns over the second phase.
  • Tanveer Ilyas has been defeated in Neelum, and IPP has announced a boycott of the third election phase.

Story so far

Following the Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) elections, the ruling PML-N and opposition parties exchanged sharp accusations regarding the fairness of the electoral process. PML-N leader Rana Sanaullah dismissed rigging allegations, while opposition leader Shoaib Siddiqui alleged significant irregularities and challenged for a forensic audit. Siddiqui also presented evidence regarding the rigging claims. The Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP) had previously rejected the election process and raised concerns over the second phase. In the latest developments, Tanveer Ilyas has reportedly been defeated in Neelum, and IPP has announced a boycott of the third election phase.

Latest development

Tanveer Ilyas has reportedly been defeated in Neelum, and the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP) has announced a boycott of the third phase of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir elections.

Latest updates

In a new development, Tanveer Ilyas has reportedly been defeated in Neelum. Additionally, the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP) has announced a boycott of the third phase of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir elections.

The Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP) has rejected the Azad Kashmir election process and raised concerns over the second phase of the elections.

Shoaib Siddiqui has reportedly presented evidence regarding the rigging allegations against PML-N in the AJK elections.

Sources and updates

Express News - Youtube

Tanveer Ilyas Defeated in Neelum as IPP Announces Boycott of Third Election Phase | Breaking News

Samaa TV - Youtube

IPP Rejects Azad Kashmir Election Process, Says Shoaib Siddiqui

Responses

>